<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Feasting on the Weak</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.countthebasket.com/blog/2008/04/25/feasting-on-the-weak/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.countthebasket.com/blog/2008/04/25/feasting-on-the-weak/</link>
	<description>Advanced Stats for Basketball</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 18:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Antonio</title>
		<link>http://www.countthebasket.com/blog/2008/04/25/feasting-on-the-weak/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>Antonio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 18:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countthebasket.com/blog/?p=63#comment-210</guid>
		<description>One of the obvious affects on the second table is the higher than average numbers of stars and good offensive lineups. If, as you posit, the strongest defenders are paired with the strongest offensive players, then the numbers for the defenses will suffer. When Battier shadowed Kobe, everyone praised his fantastic defense, but Kobe went for 45,30, &#38; 24 this season against Houston. If, as one would suspect, this happens to Battier not just on Kobe, but all season long against all SG &#38; SF opponents, then his defensive stats will suffer at some point, and therefore the stats for the lineups that he is a part of.

Intuitively, or from actually watching the games, we know that must be somewhat the case. Kobe always sees the best perimeter defender from opponents, and Duncan always sees the best post defenders, which would suggest that they must be seeing better overall defensive lineups, yet they don't show up in the list.

I guess this is a convoluted way of saying that maybe the offensive ineptitude of those on the list helps the defenses look good statistically.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the obvious affects on the second table is the higher than average numbers of stars and good offensive lineups. If, as you posit, the strongest defenders are paired with the strongest offensive players, then the numbers for the defenses will suffer. When Battier shadowed Kobe, everyone praised his fantastic defense, but Kobe went for 45,30, &amp; 24 this season against Houston. If, as one would suspect, this happens to Battier not just on Kobe, but all season long against all SG &amp; SF opponents, then his defensive stats will suffer at some point, and therefore the stats for the lineups that he is a part of.</p>
<p>Intuitively, or from actually watching the games, we know that must be somewhat the case. Kobe always sees the best perimeter defender from opponents, and Duncan always sees the best post defenders, which would suggest that they must be seeing better overall defensive lineups, yet they don&#8217;t show up in the list.</p>
<p>I guess this is a convoluted way of saying that maybe the offensive ineptitude of those on the list helps the defenses look good statistically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eli</title>
		<link>http://www.countthebasket.com/blog/2008/04/25/feasting-on-the-weak/#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>Eli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countthebasket.com/blog/?p=63#comment-202</guid>
		<description>Thanks for catching that. I'll fix it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for catching that. I&#8217;ll fix it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mountain</title>
		<link>http://www.countthebasket.com/blog/2008/04/25/feasting-on-the-weak/#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>Mountain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 19:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countthebasket.com/blog/?p=63#comment-201</guid>
		<description>The tables are correctly labelled but I assume in the text of the second you meant

... no matter what, some players have to face 

harder /  better defensive lineups (with lower defensive ratings)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The tables are correctly labelled but I assume in the text of the second you meant</p>
<p>&#8230; no matter what, some players have to face </p>
<p>harder /  better defensive lineups (with lower defensive ratings)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
