<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adjusted Lineup Rankings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.countthebasket.com/blog/2008/04/24/adjusted-lineup-rankings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.countthebasket.com/blog/2008/04/24/adjusted-lineup-rankings/</link>
	<description>Advanced Stats for Basketball</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 06:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mountain</title>
		<link>http://www.countthebasket.com/blog/2008/04/24/adjusted-lineup-rankings/#comment-212</link>
		<dc:creator>Mountain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 02:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countthebasket.com/blog/?p=62#comment-212</guid>
		<description>I now realize that Adjusted player pairs and triplets could be found - by this method- by manually sorting and summing the appropriate 5 man lineups. I might try that for a few pairs but if you do a global sort or perhaps add a search function to speed it up that would be cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I now realize that Adjusted player pairs and triplets could be found - by this method- by manually sorting and summing the appropriate 5 man lineups. I might try that for a few pairs but if you do a global sort or perhaps add a search function to speed it up that would be cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mountain</title>
		<link>http://www.countthebasket.com/blog/2008/04/24/adjusted-lineup-rankings/#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator>Mountain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 16:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countthebasket.com/blog/?p=62#comment-211</guid>
		<description>Adjusted player pairs and triplets would be another interesting revelation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adjusted player pairs and triplets would be another interesting revelation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan J. Parker</title>
		<link>http://www.countthebasket.com/blog/2008/04/24/adjusted-lineup-rankings/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan J. Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 02:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countthebasket.com/blog/?p=62#comment-203</guid>
		<description>Yeah I have read his work on the topic before, although for some reason (at the time at least) it didn't seem to do what I was looking for.

I'll look again. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I have read his work on the topic before, although for some reason (at the time at least) it didn&#8217;t seem to do what I was looking for.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll look again. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eli</title>
		<link>http://www.countthebasket.com/blog/2008/04/24/adjusted-lineup-rankings/#comment-200</link>
		<dc:creator>Eli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 13:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countthebasket.com/blog/?p=62#comment-200</guid>
		<description>What you're describing is basically Dan Rosenbaum's adjusted plus/minus. As for whether there are "enough combinations," the answer is probably not if all you have is one season's worth of data.

BasketballValue calculates adjusted plus/minus for the current season here:

http://basketballvalue.com/topplayers.php?year=2007-2008

And you can find a lot more links on the topic in the "Dan Rosenbaum's adjusted plus/minus" section here:

http://www.countthebasket.com/statlinks.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What you&#8217;re describing is basically Dan Rosenbaum&#8217;s adjusted plus/minus. As for whether there are &#8220;enough combinations,&#8221; the answer is probably not if all you have is one season&#8217;s worth of data.</p>
<p>BasketballValue calculates adjusted plus/minus for the current season here:</p>
<p><a href="http://basketballvalue.com/topplayers.php?year=2007-2008" rel="nofollow">http://basketballvalue.com/topplayers.php?year=2007-2008</a></p>
<p>And you can find a lot more links on the topic in the &#8220;Dan Rosenbaum&#8217;s adjusted plus/minus&#8221; section here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.countthebasket.com/statlinks.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.countthebasket.com/statlinks.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan J. Parker</title>
		<link>http://www.countthebasket.com/blog/2008/04/24/adjusted-lineup-rankings/#comment-199</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan J. Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 13:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countthebasket.com/blog/?p=62#comment-199</guid>
		<description>This is very interesting work, something I've played around with in my head but never tried to actually do anything with it.

That said, the next level in my thinking is: can you isolate player performance based on who they're playing with and who they're playing against?

Since you've already put the data together, are there enough combinations of say Nash without the "other guys" to determine how much the "other guys" contribute to his performance and vice-versa?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is very interesting work, something I&#8217;ve played around with in my head but never tried to actually do anything with it.</p>
<p>That said, the next level in my thinking is: can you isolate player performance based on who they&#8217;re playing with and who they&#8217;re playing against?</p>
<p>Since you&#8217;ve already put the data together, are there enough combinations of say Nash without the &#8220;other guys&#8221; to determine how much the &#8220;other guys&#8221; contribute to his performance and vice-versa?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob</title>
		<link>http://www.countthebasket.com/blog/2008/04/24/adjusted-lineup-rankings/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 08:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countthebasket.com/blog/?p=62#comment-198</guid>
		<description>Wow, amazing stuff.

Some observations:
- A lineup with Steve Nash among the top defensive teams? Shawn Marion must have been good.
- It doesn't seem to be Marbury's fault that NY sucked so much.
- Nash and Stoudemire really make PHX's offense tick.
- Denver's new strategy is trying to beat LAL with one of the worst lineups in the NBA. If they're indeed an OK defensive team, it is because of Kenyon Martin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, amazing stuff.</p>
<p>Some observations:<br />
- A lineup with Steve Nash among the top defensive teams? Shawn Marion must have been good.<br />
- It doesn&#8217;t seem to be Marbury&#8217;s fault that NY sucked so much.<br />
- Nash and Stoudemire really make PHX&#8217;s offense tick.<br />
- Denver&#8217;s new strategy is trying to beat LAL with one of the worst lineups in the NBA. If they&#8217;re indeed an OK defensive team, it is because of Kenyon Martin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eli</title>
		<link>http://www.countthebasket.com/blog/2008/04/24/adjusted-lineup-rankings/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>Eli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 05:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countthebasket.com/blog/?p=62#comment-197</guid>
		<description>Yeah, there isn't a team column. I didn't put it in basically out of laziness - it wasn't in the original BasketballValue data, and I didn't feel like writing a formula to insert it. But it wouldn't take much time, so I'll try to go back and add it some time soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, there isn&#8217;t a team column. I didn&#8217;t put it in basically out of laziness - it wasn&#8217;t in the original BasketballValue data, and I didn&#8217;t feel like writing a formula to insert it. But it wouldn&#8217;t take much time, so I&#8217;ll try to go back and add it some time soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mountain</title>
		<link>http://www.countthebasket.com/blog/2008/04/24/adjusted-lineup-rankings/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>Mountain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 05:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countthebasket.com/blog/?p=62#comment-196</guid>
		<description>Thanks very much.

For some reason I am not seeing a team column at google spreadsheets or in the csv file.

Will study the file a bit before commenting on the data but clearly this represents a great leap forward beyond the raw 5 man lineup data as you show that the quality of lineups faced varies significantly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks very much.</p>
<p>For some reason I am not seeing a team column at google spreadsheets or in the csv file.</p>
<p>Will study the file a bit before commenting on the data but clearly this represents a great leap forward beyond the raw 5 man lineup data as you show that the quality of lineups faced varies significantly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
